…wait a minute.

It may be true that the Toledo Law Library owns these books and has them listed in its database… but can we be sure that this is really the same library?!

In other words, it’s like this. The only thing in the original image that clearly states it’s from the Toledo Law Library is that DVD, right? And furthermore, while it was claimed that the bar codes could be on the front of the books in question, there is no proof of that actually being the case. So…

What if the witness placed the books there themself, and then also placed a DVD from a different library to purposely fool people into thinking this was the Toledo one?! Unless there is some other proof that this is the Toledo Law Library, there shouldn’t be any problem with that! Actually, even if there was other proof, the witness could have set that up, too! And if this isn’t the Toledo library, that database evidence is useless! Yeah, it’s all useless!!

While there’s no definite proof that the witness is lying, there is also no definite proof to show that this wasn’t all a farce set up by the witness themself! Until it can be proven exactly which library this is, no one can ever conclude that!!
How’s that?! Beatriiiiiiiiiceeeeee?!!!
……….

…W-wait, where is… Beatrice?
………………This is… the wrong court, isn’t it?

S-sorry guys, I’ll just, um… see myself out, ihihi…….